<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Wolf Crossing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wolfcrossing.org/?feed=rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wolfcrossing.org</link>
	<description>An examination of the Mexican wolf program, other invasive predator reintroductions and how they impact the surrounding human habitat.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 16:47:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Mexican Wolf Releases in 3 weeks.  Multiple livestock killer and habituated problem wolves.</title>
		<link>http://wolfcrossing.org/?p=701</link>
		<comments>http://wolfcrossing.org/?p=701#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 16:47:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wolfcrossing.org/?p=701</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CALL TO ACTION Friends, Within three weeks, the Fish and Wildlife Service intends to release a pair of known problem wolves at McKenna Park in the Gila Wilderness. This is just 10 miles from several ranches in the region. The female is F1108 (look up Mexican Wolf F1108 for more information on her) which was part of the Aspen Pack that officially killed 12 yearlings on the Adobe Ranch in 2007. The male is M1133 (look up Mexican Wolf M1133 for his history) which was the wolf that had to be darted and removed for loitering in a residential neighborhood in Reserve, NM this past January. The only reason for this release is to introduce the DNA of F1108 into the existing wolf population in the wild to shore up deteriorating genetics. Please encourage Congressman Pearce to introduce legislation to defund the Mexican Wolf Reintroduction Program. Feel free to use the example email below. Please send in your emails as soon as possible to Fred Huff in the Congressman’s Las Cruces Office. Fred.Huff@mail.house.gov ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ April 16, 2013 Representative Steve Pearce 2nd Congressional District of New Mexico Dear Congressman Pearce, The Mexican Wolf Reintroduction Program continues in disarray. The destruction of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CALL TO ACTION </p>
<p>Friends,</p>
<p>Within three weeks, the Fish and Wildlife Service intends to release a pair of known problem wolves at McKenna Park in the Gila Wilderness. This is just 10 miles from several ranches in the region.</p>
<p>The female is F1108 (look up Mexican Wolf F1108 for more information on her) which was part of the Aspen Pack that officially killed 12 yearlings on the Adobe Ranch in 2007.  The male is M1133 (look up Mexican Wolf M1133 for his history) which was the wolf that had to be darted and removed for loitering in a residential neighborhood in Reserve, NM this past January. </p>
<p>The only reason for this release is to introduce the DNA of F1108 into the existing wolf population in the wild to shore up deteriorating genetics.</p>
<p>Please encourage Congressman Pearce to introduce legislation to defund the Mexican Wolf Reintroduction Program.  Feel free to use the example email below. Please send in your emails as soon as possible to Fred Huff in the Congressman’s Las Cruces Office. </p>
<p>                        Fred.Huff@mail.house.gov</p>
<p>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~</p>
<p>April 16, 2013</p>
<p>Representative Steve Pearce<br />
2nd Congressional District of New Mexico</p>
<p>Dear Congressman Pearce,</p>
<p>The Mexican Wolf Reintroduction Program continues in disarray.  The destruction of local economies, the unrelenting deception, fear and intimidation perpetrated by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service on the people of the affected communities and the devastation to ranching and outfitting industries continues unabated.</p>
<p>(I), (We), (Organization), (Unit of Local Government) urge you to lead the effort to stop this egregious program by introducing legislation to permanently defund the Mexican Wolf Reintroduction Program.</p>
<p>This travesty has to end.</p>
<p>Thank you.</p>
<p class="facebook"><a href="http://www.facebook.com/share.php?u=http://wolfcrossing.org/?p=701" target="_blank"><img src="http://wolfcrossing.org/wp-content/plugins/add-to-facebook-plugin/facebook_share_icon.gif" alt="Share on Facebook" title="Share on Facebook" /></a><a href="http://www.facebook.com/share.php?u=http://wolfcrossing.org/?p=701" target="_blank" title="Share on Facebook">Share on Facebook</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://wolfcrossing.org/?feed=rss2&#038;p=701</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>72 Congressman and Sentors sign letter urging Nationwide de-listing on wolves.</title>
		<link>http://wolfcrossing.org/?p=697</link>
		<comments>http://wolfcrossing.org/?p=697#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 20:01:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wolfcrossing.org/?p=697</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[https://filemanager.capwiz.com/filemanager/file-mgr/biggameforever/2013_March_22__wolf_delist_letter_to_Dan_Ashe_1.pdf Share on Facebook]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>https://filemanager.capwiz.com/filemanager/file-mgr/biggameforever/2013_March_22__wolf_delist_letter_to_Dan_Ashe_1.pdf</p>
<p class="facebook"><a href="http://www.facebook.com/share.php?u=http://wolfcrossing.org/?p=697" target="_blank"><img src="http://wolfcrossing.org/wp-content/plugins/add-to-facebook-plugin/facebook_share_icon.gif" alt="Share on Facebook" title="Share on Facebook" /></a><a href="http://www.facebook.com/share.php?u=http://wolfcrossing.org/?p=697" target="_blank" title="Share on Facebook">Share on Facebook</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://wolfcrossing.org/?feed=rss2&#038;p=697</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wolf Attack &#8220;Victim&#8221; story changes with witness account.</title>
		<link>http://wolfcrossing.org/?p=698</link>
		<comments>http://wolfcrossing.org/?p=698#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Mar 2013 19:49:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Habituated Predators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video's and News Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wolf/Human Interaction]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wolfcrossing.org/?p=698</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The victim was trying to feed the obviously rabid or ill wolf. http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/local/witness-sinks-teeth-into-womans-wolf-tale-199490591.html Share on Facebook]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The victim was trying to feed the obviously rabid or ill wolf.  </p>
<p><a href="http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/local/witness-sinks-teeth-into-womans-wolf-tale-199490591.html">http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/local/witness-sinks-teeth-into-womans-wolf-tale-199490591.html</a></p>
<p class="facebook"><a href="http://www.facebook.com/share.php?u=http://wolfcrossing.org/?p=698" target="_blank"><img src="http://wolfcrossing.org/wp-content/plugins/add-to-facebook-plugin/facebook_share_icon.gif" alt="Share on Facebook" title="Share on Facebook" /></a><a href="http://www.facebook.com/share.php?u=http://wolfcrossing.org/?p=698" target="_blank" title="Share on Facebook">Share on Facebook</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://wolfcrossing.org/?feed=rss2&#038;p=698</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Attacked by wolf, Manitoba woman drives to hospital</title>
		<link>http://wolfcrossing.org/?p=686</link>
		<comments>http://wolfcrossing.org/?p=686#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 20:21:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wolfcrossing.org/?p=686</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/manitoba/story/2013/03/18/mb-wolf-attack-dawn-hepp-manitoba.html Staying calm, Dawn Hepp gets to Ashern, Man., and treatment for injuries CBC News Posted: Mar 18, 2013 9:07 AM CT Last Updated: Mar 18, 2013 5:19 PM CT Read 141 comments141 A Manitoba woman credits a childhood lesson for saving her life when she was attacked and bitten by a wolf at the side of a highway. Dawn Hepp was driving along Highway 6 near Grand Rapids on March 8 when she pulled over to help another driver. When she walked over to the car, a wolf lunged at her. “His face and his jaws were around my neck … so it was his fur I can feel on my face,&#8221; she said. &#8220;I could just hear my dad saying, &#8216;stay calm Dawn, stay calm Dawn.&#8217; So what I did was I just stayed calm, I didn&#8217;t yell, I didn&#8217;t scream. &#8220;He dug a little deeper with that tooth and by the larynx, whether he couldn&#8217;t get a good enough grip or what, he let go.&#8221; At that moment, Hepp jumped into her car and pulled up next to the people in the other vehicle she had stopped to help. &#8220;I rolled down my window and said, &#8216;You [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/manitoba/story/2013/03/18/mb-wolf-attack-dawn-hepp-manitoba.html</p>
<p>Staying calm, Dawn Hepp gets to Ashern, Man., and treatment for injuries<br />
CBC News<br />
Posted: Mar 18, 2013 9:07 AM CT<br />
Last Updated: Mar 18, 2013 5:19 PM CT<br />
Read 141 comments141</p>
<p>A Manitoba woman credits a childhood lesson for saving her life when she was attacked and bitten by a wolf at the side of a highway.</p>
<p>Dawn Hepp was driving along Highway 6 near Grand Rapids on March 8 when she pulled over to help another driver.</p>
<p>When she walked over to the car, a wolf lunged at her.</p>
<p>“His face and his jaws were around my neck … so it was his fur I can feel on my face,&#8221; she said.</p>
<p>&#8220;I could just hear my dad saying, &#8216;stay calm Dawn, stay calm Dawn.&#8217; So what I did was I just stayed calm, I didn&#8217;t yell, I didn&#8217;t scream.</p>
<p>&#8220;He dug a little deeper with that tooth and by the larynx, whether he couldn&#8217;t get a good enough grip or what, he let go.&#8221;</p>
<p>At that moment, Hepp jumped into her car and pulled up next to the people in the other vehicle she had stopped to help.</p>
<p>&#8220;I rolled down my window and said, &#8216;You guys are OK? I&#8217;ve gotta go. I&#8217;ve gotta get to the nearest hospital,&#8217;&#8221; she said.</p>
<p>&#8220;I just said, &#8216;I gotta get going&#8217;, and they said, &#8216;Yeah, we were worried about you.&#8217;&#8221;</p>
<p>Remaining calm, Hepp drove herself to the hospital in Ashern and was treated for puncture wounds and rabies.</p>
<p>Ken Rebizant is with Manitoba Conservation and said the animal could have been hungry or sick.</p>
<p>&#8220;It is very rare. I have been with wildlife branch for 25 years, and this is the first case that I have heard of of this kind in Manitoba,&#8221; said Rebizant.</p>
<p>Grand Rapids is located about 415 kilometres north of Winnipeg.</p>
<p class="facebook"><a href="http://www.facebook.com/share.php?u=http://wolfcrossing.org/?p=686" target="_blank"><img src="http://wolfcrossing.org/wp-content/plugins/add-to-facebook-plugin/facebook_share_icon.gif" alt="Share on Facebook" title="Share on Facebook" /></a><a href="http://www.facebook.com/share.php?u=http://wolfcrossing.org/?p=686" target="_blank" title="Share on Facebook">Share on Facebook</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://wolfcrossing.org/?feed=rss2&#038;p=686</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rabies Vector Bill Defeated in New Mexico, HB 579 Goes Down</title>
		<link>http://wolfcrossing.org/?p=693</link>
		<comments>http://wolfcrossing.org/?p=693#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 18:39:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Abuse of Authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rabies in the Southwest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wolfcrossing.org/?p=693</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you New Mexico Trappers. NMTA and Coalition kill HB579 Text: This year&#8217;s efforts to end trapping in New Mexico have failed. The bill was tabled this morning in the House energy and Natural Resources Committee. This was the second best outcome; a Do Not Pass vote would have been slightly better. Given that there are few days remaining in this session and the strong showing made by the NMTA and our friends, this tabling vote is a death sentence for the bill. There were two highlights of today&#8217;s brief session: Before the chair opened the meeting the R&#8217;s were caucusing somewhere. One R came into the room and a D asked him where his people were &#8230;the D&#8217;s were ready. Without hesitation Rep Madalena responded &#8221; they&#8217;re out checking their traps&#8221;. (I liked that one, Madalena was the swing vote). After the bill was tabled, a D who supported the bill, commented , and I paraphrase here&#8230;I have never received so many e-mails and calls on a bill. I congratulate you for organizing your people. Later in the hall an R made a similar remark and thanked us. You folks did a bang up job. Trapping would have suffered [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you New Mexico Trappers.  </p>
<p>NMTA and Coalition kill HB579<br />
Text: This year&#8217;s efforts to end trapping in New Mexico have failed. The bill was tabled this morning in the House energy and Natural Resources Committee. This was the second best outcome; a Do Not Pass vote would have been slightly better. Given that there are few days remaining in this session and the strong showing made by the NMTA and our friends, this tabling vote is a death sentence for the bill.<br />
There were two highlights of today&#8217;s brief session: Before the chair opened the meeting the R&#8217;s were caucusing somewhere. One R came into the room and a D asked him where his people were &#8230;the D&#8217;s were ready. Without hesitation Rep Madalena responded &#8221; they&#8217;re out checking their traps&#8221;. (I liked that one, Madalena was the swing vote). After the bill was tabled, a D who supported the bill, commented , and I paraphrase here&#8230;I have never received so many e-mails and calls on a bill. I congratulate you for organizing your people. Later in the hall an R made a similar remark and thanked us.<br />
You folks did a bang up job. Trapping would have suffered a terrible blow if it not for your hard work and diligence. I hope that we can now recommit to our goals and be even better prepared for the next round in two years.<br />
We are not finished. When this session is over be on the watch for another e-mail with a list of legislators who need to learn of your thanks for their support. These e-mails are everry bit as important to send as were those requesting help.<br />
Personally, I am gratified by the cooperation of my members, our coalition partners, department and legislative friends&#8230;you ROCK!<br />
T.D. McDowell<br />
President NMTA</p>
<p>We will be making better effort throughout the year to educate the public on the affects of disease spread and the impacts states without trapping are experiencing.  Public Safety is at stake and not the way the Anti- Trappers think it is.  </p>
<p class="facebook"><a href="http://www.facebook.com/share.php?u=http://wolfcrossing.org/?p=693" target="_blank"><img src="http://wolfcrossing.org/wp-content/plugins/add-to-facebook-plugin/facebook_share_icon.gif" alt="Share on Facebook" title="Share on Facebook" /></a><a href="http://www.facebook.com/share.php?u=http://wolfcrossing.org/?p=693" target="_blank" title="Share on Facebook">Share on Facebook</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://wolfcrossing.org/?feed=rss2&#038;p=693</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>John Cornyn Introduces Endangered Species Act Settlement Reform Act</title>
		<link>http://wolfcrossing.org/?p=691</link>
		<comments>http://wolfcrossing.org/?p=691#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2013 02:22:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bills and Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wolf Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wolfcrossing.org/?p=691</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John Cornyn Introduces Endangered Species Act Settlement Reform Act by Cole Shooter Yesterday Texas U.S. Senator John Cornyn has introduced legislation to prevent abuse of Endangered Species Act litigation. Cornyn introduced the Endangered Species Act Settlement Reform Act, which will give impacted local parties a say in the settlement of litigation between special interest groups and the Fish and Wildlife Service. “ESA litigation abuse has shut out those folks most affected by the kind of closed-door settlements we’ve seen,” said Cornyn. “My bill opens up the process to give job creators and local officials a say.” Cornyn says that the bill adds protection for American citizens from the regulatory impact of closed-door litigation settlements between special interest groups and the Fish and Wildlife Service. In 2011, two environmental groups settled multi-district litigation with the FWS that resulted in a “work plan” for the agency to make endangered species list determinations for hundreds of species, and the settlement also required taxpayers to pay the plaintiffs’ litigation fees. The suits were brought against the FWS because it failed to meet certain statutory deadlines after being flooded with requests to list hundreds of species. Cornyn’s office says that Closed-Door ESA settlements not only [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://kfyo.com/john-cornyn-introduces-endangered-species-act-settlement-reform-act/"></p>
<p>John Cornyn Introduces Endangered Species Act Settlement Reform Act<br />
by Cole Shooter Yesterday<br />
Texas U.S. Senator John Cornyn has introduced legislation to prevent abuse of Endangered Species Act litigation.<br />
Cornyn introduced the Endangered Species Act Settlement Reform Act, which will give impacted local parties a say in the settlement of litigation between special interest groups and the Fish and Wildlife Service.<br />
“ESA litigation abuse has shut out those folks most affected by the kind of closed-door settlements we’ve seen,” said Cornyn. “My bill opens up the process to give job creators and local officials a say.”<br />
Cornyn says that the bill adds protection for American citizens from the regulatory impact of closed-door litigation settlements between special interest groups and the Fish and Wildlife Service.<br />
In 2011, two environmental groups settled multi-district litigation with the FWS that resulted in a “work plan” for the agency to make endangered species list determinations for hundreds of species, and the settlement also required taxpayers to pay the plaintiffs’ litigation fees.<br />
The suits were brought against the FWS because it failed to meet certain statutory deadlines after being flooded with requests to list hundreds of species.<br />
Cornyn’s office says that Closed-Door ESA settlements not only threaten unwarranted regulation, but give plaintiffs undue leverage over local land owners, businesses, and elected officials in the conservation process</p>
<p class="facebook"><a href="http://www.facebook.com/share.php?u=http://wolfcrossing.org/?p=691" target="_blank"><img src="http://wolfcrossing.org/wp-content/plugins/add-to-facebook-plugin/facebook_share_icon.gif" alt="Share on Facebook" title="Share on Facebook" /></a><a href="http://www.facebook.com/share.php?u=http://wolfcrossing.org/?p=691" target="_blank" title="Share on Facebook">Share on Facebook</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://wolfcrossing.org/?feed=rss2&#038;p=691</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pack of wolves kills 10-year-old child in Siberia</title>
		<link>http://wolfcrossing.org/?p=689</link>
		<comments>http://wolfcrossing.org/?p=689#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2013 02:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wolfcrossing.org/?p=689</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pack of wolves kills 10-year-old child in Siberia 01.03.2013 &#124; Source: Pravda.Ru Source: Itar-Tass Krasnoyarsk media have reported details of the incident that took place near the village of Essey. A 10-year-old boy was killed by a pack of wolves. Meanwhile, officials with the Central Investigation Department of the Krasnoyarsk region release cautious comments about the incident. On February 28, 2013, law enforcement agencies received information saying that the body of a 10-year-old boy with signs of violent death had been found on the isthmus of Essey Lake, located in the village of the same name. There were multiple lacerated wounds on the child&#8217;s body, similar to animal bites. Either wolf or dog traces were found near the boy&#8217;s body. According to preliminary reports, in the evening of February 28, the boy went to see his brother home. The boy&#8217;s mother, alarmed by his long absence, went out to search for her son and found the child dead. Share on Facebook]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://english.pravda.ru/news/hotspots/01-03-2013/123944-wolves_siberia-0/"></p>
<p>Pack of wolves kills 10-year-old child in Siberia<br />
01.03.2013 | Source:<br />
Pravda.Ru</p>
<p>Source: Itar-Tass<br />
Krasnoyarsk media have reported details of the incident that took place near the village of Essey. A 10-year-old boy was killed by a pack of wolves. Meanwhile, officials with the Central Investigation Department of the Krasnoyarsk region release cautious comments about the incident.<br />
On February 28, 2013, law enforcement agencies received information saying that the body of a 10-year-old boy with signs of violent death had been found on the isthmus of Essey Lake, located in the village of the same name. There were multiple lacerated wounds on the child&#8217;s body, similar to animal bites.<br />
Either wolf or dog traces were found near the boy&#8217;s body.<br />
According to preliminary reports, in the evening of February 28, the boy went to see his brother home. The boy&#8217;s mother, alarmed by his long absence, went out to search for her son and found the child dead.</p>
<p class="facebook"><a href="http://www.facebook.com/share.php?u=http://wolfcrossing.org/?p=689" target="_blank"><img src="http://wolfcrossing.org/wp-content/plugins/add-to-facebook-plugin/facebook_share_icon.gif" alt="Share on Facebook" title="Share on Facebook" /></a><a href="http://www.facebook.com/share.php?u=http://wolfcrossing.org/?p=689" target="_blank" title="Share on Facebook">Share on Facebook</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://wolfcrossing.org/?feed=rss2&#038;p=689</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lively public comment session delays committee vote on trapping ban &#8211; See more at: http://www.santafenewmexican.com/local%20news/022813xgrTRAP#.US9zs1dweYk</title>
		<link>http://wolfcrossing.org/?p=687</link>
		<comments>http://wolfcrossing.org/?p=687#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2013 15:48:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wolfcrossing.org/?p=687</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Staci Matlock &#124; The New Mexican Posted: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 &#8211; 2 &#8211; See more at: http://www.santafenewmexican.com/local%20news/022813xgrTRAP#.US9zs1dweYk Thirteen-year-old Trenton Dale of Alamogordo, who testified before the House Energy and Natural Resources Committee on Tuesday morning, represents what most people support — a youth who spends a lot of time outdoors. But Dale also traps coyotes. That put him on the wrong side of more than a dozen conservationists, hikers and animal-rights advocates at the committee meeting in support of House Bill 579, a measure that essentially bans wildlife trapping for fur or predation on public and private land in New Mexico. - See more at: http://www.santafenewmexican.com/local%20news/022813xgrTRAP#.US9zs1dweYk Share on Facebook]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Staci Matlock | The New Mexican<br />
Posted: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 &#8211; 2 &#8211; See more at: http://www.santafenewmexican.com/local%20news/022813xgrTRAP#.US9zs1dweYk</p>
<p>Thirteen-year-old Trenton Dale of Alamogordo, who testified before the House Energy and Natural Resources Committee on Tuesday morning, represents what most people support — a youth who spends a lot of time outdoors.</p>
<p>But Dale also traps coyotes.</p>
<p>That put him on the wrong side of more than a dozen conservationists, hikers and animal-rights advocates at the committee meeting in support of House Bill 579, a measure that essentially bans wildlife trapping for fur or predation on public and private land in New Mexico.<br />
- See more at: <a href="http://www.santafenewmexican.com/local%20news/022813xgrTRAP#.US9zs1dweYk">http://www.santafenewmexican.com/local%20news/022813xgrTRAP#.US9zs1dweYk</a></p>
<p class="facebook"><a href="http://www.facebook.com/share.php?u=http://wolfcrossing.org/?p=687" target="_blank"><img src="http://wolfcrossing.org/wp-content/plugins/add-to-facebook-plugin/facebook_share_icon.gif" alt="Share on Facebook" title="Share on Facebook" /></a><a href="http://www.facebook.com/share.php?u=http://wolfcrossing.org/?p=687" target="_blank" title="Share on Facebook">Share on Facebook</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://wolfcrossing.org/?feed=rss2&#038;p=687</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NM House rejects bill to ban coyote killing contests</title>
		<link>http://wolfcrossing.org/?p=674</link>
		<comments>http://wolfcrossing.org/?p=674#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2013 15:30:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wolfcrossing.org/?p=674</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.ruidosonews.com/ci_22671775/nm-consider-banning-coyote-killing-contests By SUSAN MONTOYA BRYAN Associated Press Posted: 02/26/2013 11:36:17 AM MST ALBUQUERQUE, N.M.—Legislation that sought to outlaw coyote killing contests like the one that drew close to 200 participants last weekend in southeastern New Mexico was rejected by the New Mexico House after more than two hours of debate Tuesday. The bill introduced by Rep. Nate Cote, D-Organ, would have made it illegal to organize, sponsor, arrange or participate in a coyote killing contest. Cote had argued that the contests were senseless, but lawmakers representing rural areas of New Mexico shared stories about the challenges of raising livestock with an unchecked population of predators. &#8220;We have to be able to maintain our cattle, our ranches and our livelihoods,&#8221; said Rep. William Gray, R-Artesia. Several coyote hunting contests have been held in New Mexico in recent months in which firearms have been awarded as prizes for those hunters killing the most coyotes. Ranchers have welcomed the contests as a way to trim the population and limit the loss of cattle, sheep and other livestock. The contests have sparked protest among animal rights advocates who argue that such a practice gives New Mexico a bad reputation. Rep. Brian Egolf, D-Santa Fe, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>http://www.ruidosonews.com/ci_22671775/nm-consider-banning-coyote-killing-contests</p>
<p>By SUSAN MONTOYA BRYAN Associated Press<br />
Posted:   02/26/2013 11:36:17 AM MST</p>
<p>ALBUQUERQUE, N.M.—Legislation that sought to outlaw coyote killing contests like the one that drew close to 200 participants last weekend in southeastern New Mexico was rejected by the New Mexico House after more than two hours of debate Tuesday.<br />
The bill introduced by Rep. Nate Cote, D-Organ, would have made it illegal to organize, sponsor, arrange or participate in a coyote killing contest. Cote had argued that the contests were senseless, but lawmakers representing rural areas of New Mexico shared stories about the challenges of raising livestock with an unchecked population of predators.<br />
&#8220;We have to be able to maintain our cattle, our ranches and our livelihoods,&#8221; said Rep. William Gray, R-Artesia.<br />
Several coyote hunting contests have been held in New Mexico in recent months in which firearms have been awarded as prizes for those hunters killing the most coyotes. Ranchers have welcomed the contests as a way to trim the population and limit the loss of cattle, sheep and other livestock.<br />
The contests have sparked protest among animal rights advocates who argue that such a practice gives New Mexico a bad reputation.<br />
Rep. Brian Egolf, D-Santa Fe, said during Tuesday&#8217;s debate that New Mexico rejects the idea of &#8220;killing for the sake of killing&#8221; and should send that message by outlawing the hunts. He also noted that nothing in the bill would have prevented ranchers from shooting or trapping coyotes that were threatening livestock.<br />
&#8220;It is just simply wrong to have 10 or 20 or 30 people get together and set out with the only purpose to see how much death and destruction you can bring by the end of the day,&#8221; he said. &#8220;There&#8217;s no scientific reason to do this. There is no population management reason to do this.&#8221;<br />
The idea behind the legislation was to target those hunts that awarded prizes or were put on for entertainment purposes, supporters said.<br />
For ranchers, the debate seemed to pit urban interests against a rural way of life.<br />
&#8220;Urban citizens have a police force to protect them from predators, if you will. We don&#8217;t have that same luxury in the country, and we need the ability to use the methods at hand,&#8221; said Caren Cowan, executive director of the New Mexico Cattle Growers Association, which represents about 1,500 ranchers.<br />
Cowan said each calf taken by a coyote could mean a dent of about $1,000 in the livelihood of a New Mexico rancher as well as the loss of genetics that have been culled over generations in the search for those cattle best suited for the state&#8217;s range.</p>
<p class="facebook"><a href="http://www.facebook.com/share.php?u=http://wolfcrossing.org/?p=674" target="_blank"><img src="http://wolfcrossing.org/wp-content/plugins/add-to-facebook-plugin/facebook_share_icon.gif" alt="Share on Facebook" title="Share on Facebook" /></a><a href="http://www.facebook.com/share.php?u=http://wolfcrossing.org/?p=674" target="_blank" title="Share on Facebook">Share on Facebook</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://wolfcrossing.org/?feed=rss2&#038;p=674</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Documents for New and Improved but not legally dispersed Mexican wolf proposed plan.</title>
		<link>http://wolfcrossing.org/?p=680</link>
		<comments>http://wolfcrossing.org/?p=680#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2013 20:47:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wolfcrossing.org/?p=680</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Southwestern Wolf Management Plan.2012.draft.12-17-12 Preliminary draft EA V2 wolf management plan 12-18-12 Only Select Counties and Tribes in AZ and Texas and a few in NM were given access to these documents. Then only had 3 weeks to render the documents and send in relevant comments. Not enough time to even get on a county government agenda. Was your county left out? Many rural counties did not even receive these documents Instructions below. There is a comment deadline of February 1, 2013 for counties, tribes, and agencies to respond prior to these documents being released to the public for comment. The information was mailed on December 20, so best case most people didn’t begin receiving until December 26. Most county commissions meet only once or twice a month and for some counties, the documents were not received in time to get the issue on meeting agendas for those in early January. Additionally, with all due respect to counties and their hard working staff members, many do not have anyone on staff with the expertise to add this volume of information in such a short turnaround time. We need you to do two (2) things immediately: 1. Find out if YOUR [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='http://wolfcrossing.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Southwestern-Wolf-Management-Plan.2012.draft_.12-17-12.pdf'>Southwestern Wolf Management Plan.2012.draft.12-17-12</a></p>
<p><a href='http://wolfcrossing.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Preliminary-draft-EA-V2-wolf-management-plan-12-18-121.pdf'>Preliminary draft EA V2 wolf management plan 12-18-12</a></p>
<p>Only Select Counties and Tribes in AZ and Texas and a few in NM were given access to these documents.  Then only had 3 weeks to render the documents and send in relevant comments.  Not enough time to even get on a county government agenda.  Was your county left out?  Many rural counties did not even receive these documents</p>
<p>Instructions below.  There is a comment deadline of February 1, 2013 for counties, tribes, and agencies to respond prior to these documents being released to the public for comment.  The information was mailed on December 20, so best case most people didn’t begin receiving until December 26.  Most county commissions meet only once or twice a month and for some counties, the documents were not received in time to get the issue on meeting agendas for those in early January.  Additionally, with all due respect to counties and their hard working staff members, many do not have anyone on staff with the expertise to add this volume of information in such a short turnaround time.</p>
<p>We need you to do two (2) things immediately:</p>
<p>1.   Find out if YOUR county received the documents, if they did not, please let us know ASAP.<br />
2.   Request that your county write a letter to:</p>
<p>Sheryl L. Barrett<br />
Mexican Wolf Recovery Coordinator<br />
US Fish &#038; Wildlife Service<br />
NM Ecological Services Field Office<br />
2105 Osune NE<br />
Albuquerque NM 87113</p>
<p>          Asking for a 90-day extension of time the February 1 deadline.</p>
<p>It would be great if the NMCGA could get a copy of that request.</p>
<p>If you have questions, please let us know and thanks in advance for your help.</p>
<p>We are working to assist in the development of comments to make available to those who might like assistance.</p>
<p>Caren Cowan<br />
New Mexico Cattle Growers’ Association<br />
POB 7517<br />
Albuquerque NM 87194<br />
505.247.0584 phone<br />
505.842.1755 fax<br />
nmcga@nmagriculture.org</p>
<p>Remember … you can join NMCGA on the web NOW at <a href="http://www.nmagriculture.org">http://www.nmagriculture.org/</a> !</p>
<p class="facebook"><a href="http://www.facebook.com/share.php?u=http://wolfcrossing.org/?p=680" target="_blank"><img src="http://wolfcrossing.org/wp-content/plugins/add-to-facebook-plugin/facebook_share_icon.gif" alt="Share on Facebook" title="Share on Facebook" /></a><a href="http://www.facebook.com/share.php?u=http://wolfcrossing.org/?p=680" target="_blank" title="Share on Facebook">Share on Facebook</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://wolfcrossing.org/?feed=rss2&#038;p=680</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
