<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FWS Perspective on Scope of Non Essential Population Rule</title>
	<link>http://wolfcrossing.org</link>
	<description>Examination of the Wolf Reintroduction Program &#038; Wolf Education</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 07:23:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Randy</title>
		<link>http://wolfcrossing.org/wolf-program/fws-perspective-on-scope-of-non-essential-population-rule/#comment-14441</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 00:58:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://wolfcrossing.org/wolf-program/fws-perspective-on-scope-of-non-essential-population-rule/#comment-14441</guid>
		<description>Bill and Gregory are absolutely right. Look at the staff of CBD and the lawyers outnumber the biologists by a long shot. This organization preys on the uninformed "do gooders" for donations so they can feel all touchy feely thinking they are saving the planet. BS! The lawyers just want the paychecks! It would be interesting to know exactly how much tax money (our money) goes to defend all of their lawsuits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill and Gregory are absolutely right. Look at the staff of CBD and the lawyers outnumber the biologists by a long shot. This organization preys on the uninformed &#8220;do gooders&#8221; for donations so they can feel all touchy feely thinking they are saving the planet. BS! The lawyers just want the paychecks! It would be interesting to know exactly how much tax money (our money) goes to defend all of their lawsuits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://wolfcrossing.org/wolf-program/fws-perspective-on-scope-of-non-essential-population-rule/#comment-10005</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 22:59:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://wolfcrossing.org/wolf-program/fws-perspective-on-scope-of-non-essential-population-rule/#comment-10005</guid>
		<description>It appears to me that litigation is the only way to get FWS's attention.  The so called environmental groups are experts at this game and we the citizens pay them for it when they win. Where are the livestock organizations, property rights groups, hunters and people that live or want to own homes in this area!? If they do not step up real soon it will be to late. It takes money and lots of it to fight the propaganda that the CBD and other groups like them constintly put out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It appears to me that litigation is the only way to get FWS&#8217;s attention.  The so called environmental groups are experts at this game and we the citizens pay them for it when they win. Where are the livestock organizations, property rights groups, hunters and people that live or want to own homes in this area!? If they do not step up real soon it will be to late. It takes money and lots of it to fight the propaganda that the CBD and other groups like them constintly put out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gregory Scott</title>
		<link>http://wolfcrossing.org/wolf-program/fws-perspective-on-scope-of-non-essential-population-rule/#comment-7561</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregory Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2007 05:12:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://wolfcrossing.org/wolf-program/fws-perspective-on-scope-of-non-essential-population-rule/#comment-7561</guid>
		<description>It amazes me how people from other states / cities with in our own States that have nothing to do with any wolf or wolf program and they all seem to jump on board with all the people that are behind this stupid unconstatuitnal movement. They dont have no idea what they are talking about they just think and belive this hybred wolf should be back in the forest to eat the sick animals that are about to die anyway.
These people can read or here something and think it is the truth and have no idea how bad bringing the wolf back really is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It amazes me how people from other states / cities with in our own States that have nothing to do with any wolf or wolf program and they all seem to jump on board with all the people that are behind this stupid unconstatuitnal movement. They dont have no idea what they are talking about they just think and belive this hybred wolf should be back in the forest to eat the sick animals that are about to die anyway.<br />
These people can read or here something and think it is the truth and have no idea how bad bringing the wolf back really is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://wolfcrossing.org/wolf-program/fws-perspective-on-scope-of-non-essential-population-rule/#comment-6703</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2007 19:26:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://wolfcrossing.org/wolf-program/fws-perspective-on-scope-of-non-essential-population-rule/#comment-6703</guid>
		<description>Folks, I know this looks biased to those of us who have worked so hard for equitable treatment for those actually living with and affected by the wolf program.  
The agriculuture groups have also published a petition for rule change and it is nowhere to be found in the federal register announcement.  

Most of the currently identified issues are not going to help our ranchers and residents with wolves in their cattle and yards.  Even though, we have worked our tailes off earlier to make sure we were heard.  There is even subjective language used in this document that indicates we have merely "mis-percieved" what is happening on the ground.  It is nothing short of bias and if we are not involved early and often it will only get worse. 

It just seems as if most of the folks involved in this program are just not capable of listening at least to anyone without a law firm backing them up.  

So I am hoping you will join us in adding your voice and your issues to the scoping process.  We will be having someone at as many ag related meetings as we can to help you with your scoping comments and letters.  So if you are having a meeting, convention or seminar and want us there please email admin@wolfcrossing.org.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Folks, I know this looks biased to those of us who have worked so hard for equitable treatment for those actually living with and affected by the wolf program.<br />
The agriculuture groups have also published a petition for rule change and it is nowhere to be found in the federal register announcement.  </p>
<p>Most of the currently identified issues are not going to help our ranchers and residents with wolves in their cattle and yards.  Even though, we have worked our tailes off earlier to make sure we were heard.  There is even subjective language used in this document that indicates we have merely &#8220;mis-percieved&#8221; what is happening on the ground.  It is nothing short of bias and if we are not involved early and often it will only get worse. </p>
<p>It just seems as if most of the folks involved in this program are just not capable of listening at least to anyone without a law firm backing them up.  </p>
<p>So I am hoping you will join us in adding your voice and your issues to the scoping process.  We will be having someone at as many ag related meetings as we can to help you with your scoping comments and letters.  So if you are having a meeting, convention or seminar and want us there please email <a href="mailto:admin@wolfcrossing.org.">admin@wolfcrossing.org.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
